What is gerrymandering in U.S.?
Learn how to stop gerrymandering in the U.S. with independent commissions, legal challenges, voting reforms, and citizen action. Explore solutions for fair elections.
Gerrymandering in the U.S. is the practice of drawing electoral district boundaries in a way that gives one political party an unfair advantage over others. It is typically done by state legislatures and can significantly impact election outcomes.Types of Gerrymandering:
- Partisan Gerrymandering – Districts are drawn to benefit a specific political party.
- Racial Gerrymandering – Districts are manipulated to weaken the voting power of racial or ethnic groups.
- Incumbent Gerrymandering – Districts are shaped to protect current officeholders from competition.
Common Tactics:
- "Packing" – Concentrating opposing voters into a few districts to reduce their influence elsewhere.
- "Cracking" – Splitting opposing voters across multiple districts to dilute their voting power.
Impacts of Gerrymandering:
- Creates uncompetitive elections
- Reduces voter influence
- Skews representation in government
- Leads to political polarization
Legal Status:
- The Supreme Court has ruled that partisan gerrymandering is a political issue, not enforceable by federal courts.
- Racial gerrymandering, however, can be challenged under the Voting Rights Act.
1. Classic Example: North Carolina
North Carolina has been a key battleground for gerrymandering. In the 2012 election:- Republican candidates won 9 out of 13 congressional seats, despite only getting 49% of the statewide vote.
- This was achieved through "packing" Democratic voters into a few districts and "cracking" others into Republican-leaning areas.
Before: A more balanced distribution of districts.
After: Districts manipulated to favor one party.

(North Carolina's gerrymandered congressional districts)
2. Texas Racial Gerrymandering
Texas has faced legal battles over racial gerrymandering:- In some cases, Hispanic and Black communities were "cracked" into multiple districts to reduce their voting power.
- The Supreme Court ruled in 2018 that some districts were illegally drawn to suppress minority voters.
This image from the Brennan Center shows how district lines changed to dilute minority votes.
(Texas districts accused of racial gerrymandering)
3. Maryland: A Democratic Gerrymander
Not all gerrymandering benefits Republicans—Maryland's Democratic-controlled legislature redrew districts to weaken Republican influence.- In 2012, a long-time Republican-held district was redrawn to favor Democrats.
- The district map was so distorted it looked like a squiggly "C" shape looping around other areas.

(Maryland’s 3rd congressional district, called one of the most gerrymandered in the U.S.)
Final Thoughts
Gerrymandering is a major issue in U.S. politics, affecting fair representation and election outcomes. Some states, like California and Michigan, have created independent commissions to draw districts instead of politicians.How to Combat Gerrymandering in the U.S.
Several states and organizations are working to reduce gerrymandering through reforms, legal challenges, and independent oversight. Here’s how:1. Independent Redistricting Commissions
Some states have taken redistricting power away from politicians and given it to independent or bipartisan commissions. These commissions aim to create fairer, more competitive districts.Examples of States with Independent Commissions:
- California – The Citizens Redistricting Commission draws congressional and state legislative maps.
- Michigan – A voter-approved commission (2018) oversees redistricting instead of lawmakers.
- Arizona & Colorado – Have similar independent commissions.

2. Voting Rights Act & Legal Challenges
Courts have historically played a role in striking down gerrymandered maps:- Racial gerrymandering can be challenged under the Voting Rights Act (VRA).
- Partisan gerrymandering is harder to fight legally— in 2019, the Supreme Court ruled that federal courts cannot intervene in partisan gerrymandering cases, leaving it to the states.
- Some lawsuits have succeeded at the state level, with courts throwing out extreme partisan maps.
- North Carolina (2022) – A state court threw out a Republican-drawn map as an "unconstitutional partisan gerrymander."
- Alabama (2023) – The Supreme Court ruled that the state had diluted Black voting power and ordered new district maps.
3. Ranked-Choice Voting & Alternative Systems
Some experts propose changing how elections work to reduce the effects of gerrymandering:- Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV) – Instead of voting for one candidate, voters rank them in order of preference. This discourages extreme partisan maps.
- Multi-Member Districts – Instead of single-winner districts, states could elect multiple representatives per district, leading to fairer outcomes.

4. Ballot Initiatives & Voter Action
In many states, voters can push for redistricting reforms through ballot initiatives. These allow citizens to bypass lawmakers and directly vote on changes.Successful Ballot Initiatives:
- Michigan (2018) – Created an independent redistricting commission after a citizen-led campaign.
- Ohio (2018) – Passed new rules limiting partisan gerrymandering.
- Colorado (2018) – Voters approved an independent commission for redistricting.

- Support organizations like Common Cause, Brennan Center for Justice, or League of Women Voters, which fight for fair maps.
- Stay informed and vote for state legislators who support redistricting reform.