Yes, that is somewhat difficult to understand. We are aware that Russia has long possessed nuclear weapons.
Indeed, their arsenal of nuclear weapons was extensive and dispersed.
Then, with the collapse of the Soviet Union, things had a tendency to go awry with equipment neglect and missing items. The point is that, with fewer nuclear weapons than Russia, the US is having difficulty with its own arsenal, thus sustaining the Russian nuclear arsenal is no small feat. What is the fate of ancient nukes? I may be wrong, but as we've seen in Ukraine, delivery methods are frequently unreliable.
Film has shown missiles returning straight to their launch positions after being fired. I personally wouldn't trust the Russians as only they would know if their outdated nuclear weapons are still operational.
Then, with the collapse of the Soviet Union, things had a tendency to go awry with equipment neglect and missing items. The point is that, with fewer nuclear weapons than Russia, the US is having difficulty with its own arsenal, thus sustaining the Russian nuclear arsenal is no small feat. What is the fate of ancient nukes? I may be wrong, but as we've seen in Ukraine, delivery methods are frequently unreliable.
Film has shown missiles returning straight to their launch positions after being fired. I personally wouldn't trust the Russians as only they would know if their outdated nuclear weapons are still operational.